Are counties really necessary in Royal Mail's PAF
 
 

Are counties really necessary in Royal Mail's PAF

by richardh 4. August 2010 10:42

According to recent reports in the media, the Royal Mail are currently considering removing counties from the Postal Address File - PAF at some point.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-10825499

This is not particularly news to anyone in the industry, counties have been disliked by the Royal Mail for some time.

They are unnecessary for the delivery of mail; an address's locality is identified by its main postal town making the county at best a piece of superfluous information and at worst a piece of conflicting vanity information. County borders have moved over time and are not clearly marked - this allows for consumers the scope to use vanity counties - "I think you'll find it's in Surrey, darling!".

The situation is confused by the fact that there are 3 different types of county in PAF: Traditional, Administrative and Postal. So, according to the Royal Mail, an address could have several different counties. Additionally, some traditional county names, such as North Humberside and Dyfed, no longer exist in any administrative fashion. Driffield is either in Yorkshire (Traditional), North Humberside (Former Postal) or East Riding of Yorkshire (Administrative).

At data8, both our postcode lookup software and our PAF cleansing service can be configured to produce addresses with or without counties. In terms of managing your database and delivering letters it seems that counties have had their day, however be aware that there are still a lot of people out there who very much prefer to have their county on their envelope!

Tags: , ,

Industry Comment

Comments

8/4/2010 4:14:58 PM #

Darren Low

Not only are they not required to deliver the mail, it is also really useful to be able to reduce the number of address lines being used.

I'm still always amazed at the number of client databses/mainframes that only cater for 4 or 5 lines of address (and that includes the Postcode) so being able to drop something is a winner - especially with the icnrease in flats especailly conversions which seems to add lots of data to the front end of the address

Darren Low United Kingdom

8/4/2010 4:24:30 PM #

pingback

Pingback from topsy.com

Twitter Trackbacks for
        
        Are counties really necessary in Royal Mail's PAF
        [data-8.co.uk]
        on Topsy.com

topsy.com

8/5/2010 11:45:46 PM #

Ian Evans

"counties have been disliked by the Royal Mail for some time"

disliked? No. Superfluous for mail delivery purposes - Yes!

Ian Evans United Kingdom

Comments are closed

RecentComments

Comment RSS
Skip Navigation Links
Request handled by server S1 for client 38.107.179.219 at 5/18/2012 8:37:23 AM